Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Act I : This is some drama-packed stuff!

Incredulously, as opposed to many, some women choose to let themselves live down to society’s standards. During Act I, of the play A Doll’s House, we are introduced to a dependant, misunderstood and “frivolous” woman. Her name is Nora Helmer. Although she commonly answers to the names of squirrel, skylark, and even featherbrain to her husband, this woman doesn’t have one indiscreet bone in her body. Her husband is Torvald Helmer. Together they have three children and Torvald is a lawyer who is soon to be placed as the manager of a bank. The fact that Torvald is going to be the manager of a bank means he is going to be ranked higher, leading to a better income. This leaves Nora ecstatic because she is constantly squandering about buying macaroons and generally useless things. His position as manager at the bank will eventually result with more spending money in her pockets. Torvald is a man of dignity, pride and power over Nora. He believes that it is unacceptable to under any circumstances borrow money form anyone else and remain in debt with that person. As they say, for every action there is a reaction. Unfortunately, Nora never took this rule into account. During a desperate time of her husbands degenerating health state, Nora decides to take matters into her own hands. In order to save her husbands life, she needs to some how temporarily migrate her family to live in Italy due to their warmer weather. In order to that, one would think she’d need money, right? Exactly. Then one would realize that Nora doesn’t have a job so how is she expected to pay for this? Well, Nora does exactly what her husband doesn’t want her to do. She ends up borrowing money from Krogstad, another character who works at the bank with her husband, which disapproves of him due to his supposed “low morals” along with his criminal record. Nora is so desperate for this money, that she forges her dieing father’s signature to consent that if for any reason she cannot repay Krogstad, he (her father) would complete the payments. Her father dies after the date she signed to the agreement, leaving an undiscovered loophole in whole situation. After she completes the forgery without anyone but herself and Krogstad knowing and behind her husband’s back she ends up saving his life. This secret of hers is never to be revealed and known by very few. Shortly after the play commences, the tables turn and Krogstad is in desperate need of Nora’s help. Mrs.Linde, Nora’s friend, comes back seeking employment from Torvald and now Krogstad’s position at the bank is at risk. He quickly learns that he is being replaced by Mrs.Linde and begins to panic. Krogstad is trying to recover from his life of crime and misdoing. He is trying to earn his respect back and clear his family name up throughout town. Ironically enough, he confronts Nora about her forgery and threatens to reveal her secret to her husband if she does not persuade Torvald to secure his position at the bank. Once Krogstad leaves, Torvald arrives and Nora presents the idea of keeping Krogstad’s position secure at the bank to him. In response, Torvald vehemently tells Nora that all he wants is to get Krogstad out of the bank and away from them. In a helpless effort to remain inconspicuous, she agrees. By the end of Act I, Nora had created and buried herself in a scandalous situation that is becoming drama-packed by the sentence!

6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with what you said on Krogstad a lot, although he is the antagonist he simply wants to recover from his previous wrongs and Nora stands in the way of this.


    P.S.
    I don't think we could edit our comments if we make an error. :xp

    ReplyDelete
  3. hey michelle thanks for the comment haha, but your details of the characters is dead on. What you said about Krogstad was great and I completely agree with you, but I do have a feeling he's trying to expose Nora for more than just trying to redeem himself. Your break down of Act I was great and I'm looking forward to the others....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great job on describing the characters. I agree on how you put out the fact that at first, Nora seemed dependent and as if she always listened to her husband but as the play progressed, her character changes and we find out about the real Nora. You explained Act I in very descriptive and good detail. (=

    BTW - we need to chill sometime soon :] <3

    ReplyDelete
  5. you got a lot of good points for act I sorry I'm a little late

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey thanks for the comment but I mistakenly left the part out that I eventually told her haha.

    ReplyDelete